Document Type : Original Article
Authors
Allameh Tabataba’i University, Tehran, Iran.
Abstract
Keywords
Main Subjects
Amouzadeh, M., Karimi-Doostan, G., & Sharif, B. (2015). The semantic network of the verb “gereftan” based on the principled polysemy model. Language Research, 7(1), 117-136. [In Persian]
Anvari, H. (2002). Sokhan dictionary. Sokhan Publications. [In Persian]
Arppe, A., Gilquin, G., Glynn, D., Hilpert, M., & Zeschel, A. (2010). Cognitive corpus linguistics: Five
points of debate on current theory and methodology. Corpora, 5(1), 1-27.
Bardovi-Harlig, K. (2020). One functional approach to L2 acquisition: The concept-oriented approach.
Bybee, J. (2006). From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language, 82(4), 711–733.
Bybee, J. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge University Press.
Bybee, J. (2023). What is usage-based linguistics? In N. C. Ellis, S. Eskildsen, & A. Tyler (Eds.), The
handbook of usage-based linguistics (pp. 7–29). Oxford University Press.
Croft, W. (2001). Radical construction grammar. Oxford University Press.
Croft, W., & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
Dabir-Moghaddam, M. (1997). Compound verbs in Persian. Iranian Journal of Linguistics, 12(1-2), 2-46. [In Persian]
Dabir-Moghaddam, M. (2005). Theoretical linguistics: The emergence and development of generative
grammar. SAMT. [In Persian]
Diessel, H. (2011). Language, usage and cognition. Language, 87(4), 830–844.
Dowty, D. (1991). Thematic proto-roles and argument selection. Language, 67(3), 547-619.
Ellis, N. C. (2002a). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 143–188.
Ellis, N. C. (2002b). Reflections on frequency effects in language processing. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24(2), 297–339.
Ellis, N. C. (2008). Usage-based and form-focused language acquisition: The associative learning of constructions, learned attention, and the limited L2 endstate. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 372–405). Routledge.
Ellis, N. C., & Ferreira-Junior, F. (2009). Construction learning as a function of frequency, frequency distribution, and function. The Modern Language Journal, 93(3), 370–385.
Ellis, N. C., O’Donnell, M. B., & Römer, U. (2014). Second language verb-argument constructions are sensitive to form, function, frequency, contingency, and prototypicality. Linguistic Approaches to Bilingualism, 4(4), 405–431.
Ellis, N. C., & Wulff, S. (2015). Usage-based approaches to SLA. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed., pp. 75-93). Routledge.
Family, N. (2006). Explorations of semantic space: The case of light verb constructions in Persian [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. EHESS, Paris.
Fillmore, C. J. (1976). Frame semantics and the nature of language. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 280(1), 20–32.
Fillmore, C. J., & Atkins, B. T. S. (1998). Frame semantics and lexicographic relevance. International Journal of Lexicography, 11(4), 379–400.
Fillmore, C. J., & Baker, C. F. (2001). Frame semantics for text understanding. In Proceedings of the WordNet and other lexical resources workshop (pp. 17-18). Pittsburg.
Gilquin, G. (2008). What you think ain’t what you get: Highly polysemous verbs in mind and language.
In J.-R. Lapaire, G. Desagulier, & J.-B. Guignard (Eds.), From gram to mind: Grammar as cognition (pp. 235–255). Presse Universitaires de Bordeaux.
Goldberg, A. E. (1995). Constructions: A construction grammar approach to argument structure. University of Chicago Press.
Goldberg, A. E. (2019). Explain me this: Creativity, competition, and the partial productivity of constructions. Princeton University Press.
Hassani Jalilian, F., & Haghbin, F. (2019). Investigating the verb category from a prototype perspective based on Givon’s semantic criteria: Every verb is a category. Studies of Language and Dialects of Western Iran, 7(27), 33-53. [In Persian]
Karimi, S. (1997). Persian complex verbs: Idiomatic or compositional. Lexicology, 3, 273–318.
Karimi-Doostan, G. (1997). Light verb constructions in Persian [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Essex.
Karimi-Doostan, G. (2003). Argument structure of light verb constructions. In Proceedings of argument structure conference. Delhi, India.
Karimi-Doostan, G. (2005). Light verb and structural case. Lingua, 115(12), 1737-1756.
Karimi-Doostan, G. (2008). Event structure of verbal nouns and light verbs. In S. Karimi, V. Samiian, & D. Stilo (Eds.), Aspects of Iranian languages (pp. 209-226). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Khanlari, P. N. (2003). Persian grammar. Toos. [In Persian]
Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind. University of Chicago Press.
Langacker, R. W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Theoretical prerequisites (Vol. 1). Stanford University Press.
Levin, B. (1993). English verb classes and alternations. University of Chicago Press.
Mansouri, M. (2013). Light verb in Persian compound verbs. Studies of Language and Dialects of Western Iran, 1(1). [In Persian]
Mirzaei, A. (2015). Every verb is an event reality: The verb system in Persian. Nameh-ye Farhangestan, 15(1), 57-92. [In Persian]
Mirzaei, A. (2021). Hierarchy of semantic roles and grammatical relations in Persian. Language Related Research, 12(6), 567-597. [In Persian]
Mirzaei, A., & Moloodi, A. (2014). The first semantic role corpus of Persian language. Language Science, 3, 29-48. [In Persian]
Mirzaei, A., & Moloodi, A. (2016). Persian proposition bank. In Proceedings of the tenth international conference on language resources and evaluation (LREC’16) (pp. 3828–3835). European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
Mohammad, J., & Karimi, S. (1992). Light verbs are taken over: Complex verbs in Persian. In Proceedings of the western conference on linguistics (Vol. 5, pp. 195-212).
Ortega, L., Tyler, A. E., Park, H. I., & Uno, M. (Eds.). (2016). The usage-based study of language learning and multilingualism. Georgetown University Press.
Palmer, M., Bonial, C., & Hwang, J. D. (2014). VerbNet semantic roles and predicate guidelines [Online documentation]. University of Colorado at Boulder.
Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. John Benjamins.
Rasooli, M. S., Kouhestani, M., & Moloodi, A. (2013). Development of a Persian syntactic dependency treebank. In Proceedings of the 2013 conference of the north american chapter of the association for computational linguistics: Human language technologies (pp. 306–314). Association for Computational Linguistics.
Razmdideh, P., & Shahi Raviz, M. H. (2021). A study of the polysemy of Persian compound verbs with the light verb “gereftan” (to take) based on construction morphology. Linguistics of Iranian Dialects, 6(2), 213-252. [In Persian]
Rosch, E. H. (1973). Natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 4(3), 328–350.
Sharif, B. (2015). A cognitive study of light verbs in Persian [Unpublished doctoral dissertation]. University of Isfahan. [In Persian]
Soltani, R., Amouzadeh, M., & Rezaei, H. (2017). Force dynamics and polysemy in light verb constructions consisting of “gereftan”. Language Research, 8(2), 59-78. [In Persian]
Taylor, J. R. (2015). Prototype effects in grammar. In E. Dabrowska & D. Divjak (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 562–579). Mouton de Gruyter.
Tomasello, M. (2003). Constructing a language: A usage-based theory of language acquisition. Harvard University Press.
VanPatten, B., Keating, G. D., & Wulff, S. (Eds.). (2020). Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Zipf, G. K. (1935). The psycho-biology of language: An introduction to dynamic philology. MIT Press.
Zipf, G. K. (1949). Human behavior and the principle of least effort. Addison-Wesley.
)