Semantic Factors of Passiveness of Morphological Causative Verbs

Document Type : Original Article

Authors

1 Department of Linguistics, Faculty of Humanities, Jahrom University, Jahrom, Iran

2 Linguistic Department, Humanities Faculty, Semnan University, Semnan, Iran

Abstract

The present study aims to investigate the semantic factors affecting the passivizability of 66 morphological causative verbs in Persian (based on the list provided by Dabir-Moghaddam.The research adopts a descriptive-analytical method, and the data were collected and analyzed using the "past participle + shod" passive construction test, the passive infinitive test, the linguistic intuition of the two authors, and a search in the Hamshahri Corpus (version 2). The results indicate that although all these verbs are expected to be passivizable from a grammatical standpoint, in actual usage, approximately 65% of them occur in passive constructions within specific semantic contexts. The novelty of this research lies in the integration of Hopper and Thompson's (1980) transitivity theory and Halliday and Matthiessen's (2014) process types, as well as emphasizing the role of semantic networks and context in explaining this phenomenon. The findings reveal that verbs with an agentive, animate, and volitional subject are passivizable; however, verbs with a non-animate and non-volitional agent subject, as well as verbs with an experienced subject (mental/ cognitive), are not passivizable. It was also found that many causative verbs, particularly material process verbs, can be passivized in specific contexts with the presence of a volitional human agent.

Keywords

Main Subjects


Dabir‑Moghaddam, M. (1985). Passive in Persian. Journal of Linguistics, 2(1), 31‑46, [In Persian].
Dabir‑Moghaddam, M. (2005). Persian Linguistic Studies (Collected Papers). Tehran: University Publishing Center, [In Persian].
Safavi, K. (2018). An Introduction to Semantics. Tehran: Sureh Mehr Publications, 6th ed. [In Persian].
Mansouri, M. (2009). A study of passive in Persian based on language typology. Dastur Journal, (5), 156‑170, [In Persian].
Bybee, Joan L. (2006). From usage to grammar: the mind’s response to repetition. Language. 82:  711-733
Bybee, Joan L. (2010). Language, usage and cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University press.
Casalicchio, J., & Sheehan, M. (2025). Passives of causatives and perception verbs in Italian. Linguistic Inquiry. 1-61.
Halliday, M.A.K. and Christian M.I.M. Matthiessen (2014). An Introduction to Functional Grammar. 4th ed. New York: Routledge.
Haspelmath, M. (2019). Valency and voice. In J. Jung (Ed.). The Oxford Handbook of Language Typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hopper, Paul and Sandra Thompson (1980). Transitivity in Grammar and Discourse. Language. 56. 251-299.
Langacker, R. W. (1982). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar (vol.2). Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Levin, B. and S.Pinker (eds.) 1992. Lexical and conceptual Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Rice, S. (1987). Towards a transitive prototype: Evidence from some atypical English passives. In Proceedings of the Thirteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (pp. 422-434). Berkeley, CA: Berkeley Linguistics Society.
Saeed, J. I. )1997(. Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
Sohn, M. (2014). On the Passivizability of Benefactive Ditransitives. Korean Journal of Linguistics. 39(2), 301-320.
Yousef, Saeed (2018). Persian: A Comprehensive Grammar. London: Routledge.
Yousef, Saeed and Hayedeh Torabi (2020). Basic Persian: A Grammar and Workbook (2nd ed.). Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge.